Re: [Anima] Summary status of ANIMA drafts submission

Dear draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures authors,
>>> We are missed one essential component draft that was agreed in the initial
>>> plan:
>>>
>>> draft-X-anima-trust-bootstrap (Who is responsible?). If people are still
>>> working on it, it may be submitted after the online draft submission tool
>>> reopen at the night of Oct. 8.
>> This is draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures. It didn't get
>> re-submitted with "anima" in the title, but this is the draft.
> Hi, Michael,
>
> Even the content remains unchanged, re-submitted with "anima" in the title would be helpful. For now, this draft does not appear on the WG pages, link below, which is auto generated based on the document naming rules.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/anima/documents/
>
> Therefore, it is highly possible many people who are interested in ANIMA would miss this draft.
>
> So, please do re-submit this draft with "anima" when the online draft submission tool reopen at the night of Nov. 9th. We will have the meeting on the Monday, Nov. 10th.
Even better. Rename your draft to 
draft-pritikin-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures, send it now to 
internet-drafts@ietf.org, and cc me.
 From there, I will approve the post.

Regards, Benoit
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sheng
>
>> Michael
>>
>>> More contributions and drafts are always welcome.
>>>
>>> The status of the ANIMA meeting in the coming IETF91 will only be decided
>>> at this week's IESG meeting and the chairs are not yet known. Therefore,
>> the
>>> agenda process is running late.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Sheng
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Anima mailing list
>>> Anima@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>