IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Cloud BRSKI discussion -- Option 1 use cases

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 25 November 2019 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18D6120DCB for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:25:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id alf4X3KjKA1y for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64BF3120DC4 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id p26so7829323pfq.8 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:25:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b9AzZNW24rjhe6Eajfdq8lrN6cPlysvOu1LXUI6DAcc=; b=mXW3JcI0xJ+qNu+K20BfF7JJv4FRufth1np+8PLAYzJoTCYCjla+dJqeWc9DghFZZk Ty67KGc3arhsex13ByTsNIQfKuub/jijYH2KXEP1o2BLSleDsWm3RC8rqkpjaQjhUWz0 C5UZS4hcB58Xz6pYUL+uUvCvDOlDZofNbSnbigp3yNYz84QCujaY/9NzT7KmolMSBGf7 9o0fUd4XWCYDOjrJHS5qUkNOLAC5rw6sEi7WwvZqRpbg+eAcCQUhasF9/i7fmTbd+NFA GJMGn40dsldhZfmeVzOBuK+w+F1fvSPM3pPDn2oFAc72kQMzlKZGUrvQpThXPQalB2MA 2+GQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b9AzZNW24rjhe6Eajfdq8lrN6cPlysvOu1LXUI6DAcc=; b=ePwCLwGIQx3JK0iMgJS/XbxDP5d1xqE0fX0TGl86e3xFUHC/TzfuQG38WR0vHNVHuU RY6jWLUlEUQZthZzhibC0JvOE/htRaTnLATPo3spDF/SakKPLmmPcS44a4Y2KPgUIUdF dQrgB8IlUuXTygcwHKTO7/3iZsGgOt6LpBNpIarQCl0fjwXgLzuMoLo2a08IYdsWaNv9 ahpTeO057hM8iAZAHiw4lPjl1DjO66naVSc1VOqtXtZo3YKnAmOFyODHOPAUyJ6RgrfD ySKWAt25JGa5NDQTRpn748AYUE0GTOt2esddKb43R3+nxJGZw1b5qsgKIpf/pild/Es2 Talw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWxEV0ILbkQP/GWhhMWaff9IF1VA0etCqqodnhhP92K5RPxDVJd lqGKxOUBKcTjlysw659olG2QkgZT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyaY+mr7vEuCi6E135nqKJ/3i70YwRsEz1m1eqMKgViYaNU2G19p4Sm1NcaS1Mb+KKyPjGahw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4547:: with SMTP id u7mr24715117pgk.423.1574709932451; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (8.166.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.166.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j21sm8971452pfa.58.2019.11.25.11.25.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:25:31 -0800 (PST)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9299B9FAD2@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <MN2PR11MB3901DD8CF27429ECAF1AA874DB780@MN2PR11MB3901.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <28576.1574580524@dooku.sandelman.ca> <9c60c895-9e14-c064-9f4a-306c5d7a1105@gmail.com> <1120.1574673282@dooku.sandelman.ca>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <29988aee-9b8e-afab-1498-80dcf8b9f6fd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:25:28 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1120.1574673282@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/2w28jHsYAWnw2Px8izwuI_Alohg>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Cloud BRSKI discussion -- Option 1 use cases
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:25:35 -0000

On 25-Nov-19 22:14, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > One thing that doesn't seem to be clear either in BRSKI or in
>     > draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud is where the Cloud Registrar's "well
>     > known" URI comes from and how the pledge knows it. Is it vendor
>     > specific or what?
> 
> It is vendor specific, and it's baked in.

Thanks. That was my working assumption, but I suggest stating it up front
in draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud.

> The idea is that we can transform the well-known, but very much proprietary
> "call-home" process that many devices use today into something that enables a
> transfer of ownership mechanism.

Understood.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email