Re: [Anima] [Anima-bootstrap] weekly boostrap design team meetings

"Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com> Mon, 21 November 2016 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <pritikin@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5A5129AC9 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:15:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id umV0ubbJmBvi for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:15:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3192A129A7F for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:15:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1166; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479748510; x=1480958110; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=DgBgH/9A4lXAh+0OpxOXKwN+yvlkWES+AGLummgfkjI=; b=gTBFkw/qYAJXxD1HpAaaHrBEsTMvoyAx1AWEwp9U5ytyGmYA2sMF6ZM6 IPnTdyw8DshJ6LxAbvtzN2ItIl7RqN/EYXEtbj7HI8Ozbv8asHCMgKUuu Vgfajtslvjwvem83AkhTokKhAxtvHzaMqGOeAjA/is6ixxUrVHMjtyoeK 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BMBABYKjNY/5JdJa1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgzgBAQEBAR+BWAekS5RuggWCa4M2AhqBaUESAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEaAEBAQMBIxFFBQsCAQgYAgImAgICMBUQAgQOBYhlCKsEgimLTAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyBCYcwgl2HTS2CMAEEmk0BkHaBcIR3iUCNX4QKASUOIoEShUFyh0WBDAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,528,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="350328052"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2016 17:15:09 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (xch-aln-011.cisco.com [173.36.7.21]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uALHF9WE008422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:09 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) by XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:15:08 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com ([173.36.7.23]) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com ([173.36.7.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:15:08 -0600
From: "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] [Anima-bootstrap] weekly boostrap design team meetings
Thread-Index: AQHSQU1cH8Dx3xRPFU20eRG4kcEuf6Dfa4sAgAByCYCABDoEAA==
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:08 +0000
Message-ID: <99620E8A-4F28-4E3D-A313-E5FA2FE65774@cisco.com>
References: <9165.1479440353@dooku.sandelman.ca> <66210CE2-586F-4F04-93AF-996E35D16D57@cisco.com> <11433.1479516147@dooku.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <11433.1479516147@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.99.106.7]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CEFA585AF48D87488EDE0BCF5934788B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/818V6AGYn3YmD9rFN3jt5KjbVV8>
Cc: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Anima] [Anima-bootstrap] weekly boostrap design team meetings
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:12 -0000

I’m am OK with the current anchoring. 

It is not clear that the calendaring tools deal with this well so I wanted to be sure of how it shook out. thanks,

- max

> On Nov 18, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Max Pritikin (pritikin) <pritikin@cisco.com> wrote:
>> "time zones are hard”
> 
>> I think this shifts our meetings — making them occur 1hr earlier than
>> they have been.
> 
>> Is that intentional? Am I in error?
> 
> If the meeting is anchored to UTC, then the change is because we changed our clocks
> two weeks ago.  If you'd rather the meeting was anchored otherwise, such that
> it stays at 11am EST, please say so.  I'm flexible regardless.
> 
> -- 
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
>