Re: [Anima] [Anima-bootstrap] weekly boostrap design team meetings

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 19 November 2016 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9AD129572 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:42:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9n5vj-pSsjHh for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 160B8129567 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (cl-27.chi-03.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2604:8800:100:1a::2]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ADF61F8FB; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 00:42:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id C51A533F3; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:42:27 +0900 (KST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>
In-reply-to: <66210CE2-586F-4F04-93AF-996E35D16D57@cisco.com>
References: <9165.1479440353@dooku.sandelman.ca> <66210CE2-586F-4F04-93AF-996E35D16D57@cisco.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com> message dated "Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:54:18 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:42:27 +0900
Message-ID: <11433.1479516147@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/LcN-SJzuROVOSCodlx_U7sM3muE>
Cc: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Anima] [Anima-bootstrap] weekly boostrap design team meetings
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 00:42:33 -0000

Max Pritikin (pritikin) <pritikin@cisco.com> wrote:
    > "time zones are hard”

    > I think this shifts our meetings — making them occur 1hr earlier than
    > they have been.

    > Is that intentional? Am I in error?

If the meeting is anchored to UTC, then the change is because we changed our clocks
two weeks ago.  If you'd rather the meeting was anchored otherwise, such that
it stays at 11am EST, please say so.  I'm flexible regardless.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-