IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but...

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 18 November 2016 02:19 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A9512979D for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:19:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Otlx-zLWnTHI for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22b.google.com (mail-pg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEF38128E18 for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 3so97649013pgd.0 for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:19:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iGdc66/Pq7EFLdLOvvzS2Txc3UFm7zOgsDVYJFSdtS8=; b=J/uUO6mZQSq2QkjhxoIa6KHOJwS3TgEKQTPjbAEJMn248GEXMUs9jLF1C0kjK3vyW7 1W3ab7ExVu22/KMUM5dtH4ZKG22NBVJgPbS1Bp40zj7fPxs0QiFP+/Bz6b3nlLOYQQ9U wnX+K+eUw1vG7UhlYbI8RNWNOIZTD+tQO1m9P928T5/ojvW8h8IA5vf11mMPWZRkAlZt glUSus9lBYF0meCWMYpb9aj8s1NDIQVVf86Ub+Hj+2YwHnLQMobStxfG/FqkJQOHwzj2 Dkk7qxDurfjbeuNPHZI2agaOM8N58F0USh43yEHO+PryPAaAIhp9BlKxKyO9d6IB2oSA 4Yew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iGdc66/Pq7EFLdLOvvzS2Txc3UFm7zOgsDVYJFSdtS8=; b=VbKftCDXl73Do7kRq0KpOa9AYvUz7Gh+TjdMRMfuAM0Cz/F28FRS1m1w1KCD95oXl0 JtD/968qJlRhNy9st3D9XCqAxyJyF+AUMiDQIVCYzjeOs3Si/++FHbxdCY7M4SSSWSxn MNzSnia5McBI5SwbshUeIltvfAceefcI5SbV1vJkSW/hLPXSG2a/fhiymAuhgdbVkrRk TXBNH5j6IwVJWbsYQip+jWlZgTACdfT6ushcUsMUb7oIt4BxJtAjMntPVhJS4eYMlyjI xAGxd6qOfAUg9bhUlzwwxH8GM34QLsTDhJzyFlWUyQRC1chKecvXK6orYEybmP7Qvyht y/Jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvf2cJGV4IiN787E/sPS3dU0FgTCJvSZur0kbVyPGnFUV5YTyCzIsyqKE5KItgIjCQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.230.83 with SMTP id p19mr13817534pgj.121.1479435569237; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (117.228.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.228.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y189sm11530301pfy.32.2016.11.17.18.19.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:19:28 -0800 (PST)
To: "Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com>, Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
References: <b41817df-d962-bc3a-9b07-e30a8105affc@gmail.com> <6d3cd3431fa645c39225c6504e577e7b@XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <206d7caf-f7d2-7734-4b96-719ae48d9e90@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 15:19:34 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6d3cd3431fa645c39225c6504e577e7b@XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/FDt0J8YBR1HrpG_7bPlVnM8ilus>
Subject: Re: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but...
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:19:31 -0000

Off list.

Will do. Not before Monday though. Safe travel home.

On 18/11/2016 15:10, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Anima [mailto:anima-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E
>> Carpenter
>> Sent: 18 November 2016 10:32
>> To: Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but...
>>
>> The ACP is not an ASA, it's actually a set of components, and probably it
>> includes several daemons.
>>
>> However, I think that modelling the ACP *neighbor discovery function* as an
>> ASA is correct - it will after all be using GRASP, and it will probably need to run
>> indefinitely because of handling new neighbors or neighbors that disappear.
>> It is also a user of one of the limited instances of GRASP (I can't remember
>> which one at this moment, while also listening to Bing's talk).
> 
> The concrete question is whether we should document the ACP functional block in section 7.3 in the reference draft. 
> 
> I think you're suggesting to do so. 
> 
> In this case, can I ask you to provide some text? ;-)   As mentioned, I'm not 100% convinced, but not opposed either.  I'll then rename section 7.3 from "Specific ASAs for the Enrolment Process" to " Specific ASAs"
> 
> Agree?
> Michael
>  
>> Regards
>>    Brian
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anima mailing list
>> Anima@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email