Re: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but...
"Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com> Fri, 18 November 2016 02:10 UTC
Return-Path: <mbehring@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE3A129604 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:10:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4gYXC4c8MLOU for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:10:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DC831294FD for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:10:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1336; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479435014; x=1480644614; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=IYO73dgECURz/vQbs53rfh6WCNSXpxahVGQlNzEn2Lk=; b=U9yUM4WdimyhK8KzJJ/IR+xPldCNaSAx5OL3IiFQlgo+S36elhOikeh7 YAB1DZA2/FavhQvI98vi89JkAEFysfkwz8li8bhvu1Tdhf0v1+dBXM2EO cHU2tl7PTfEf0bNufmrdgACh4kw1aJHdXYqf02IBOgS/EJAkj775vqVmr Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A7AgBWYi5Y/5RdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzcBAQEBAR9YgQAHjTiXEJRkggcdC4RpAYEPAoIfPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRoAQEBAwEBAQE3NBAHBAIBCBEEAQEfCQcnCxQJCAIEARIIiFwIDq5Yi1cBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYY8hFqEJYYFBZpDAZBlkC2NUIQKAR43OVIdhR5yhT2BMIEMAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,655,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="349049073"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Nov 2016 02:10:10 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (xch-rcd-009.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAI2A9s7017609 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:10:09 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:10:09 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-006.cisco.com ([173.37.102.16]) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com ([173.37.102.16]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:10:09 -0600
From: "Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but...
Thread-Index: AQHSQTugJvRwHb7MpEmcDe/iGLExoaDd/mAA
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:10:08 +0000
Message-ID: <6d3cd3431fa645c39225c6504e577e7b@XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com>
References: <b41817df-d962-bc3a-9b07-e30a8105affc@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b41817df-d962-bc3a-9b07-e30a8105affc@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.70.231.136]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/oFqQUwc9w2g53tEvtIGpv2lCsQc>
Subject: Re: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but...
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:10:20 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: Anima [mailto:anima-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E > Carpenter > Sent: 18 November 2016 10:32 > To: Anima WG <anima@ietf.org> > Subject: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but... > > The ACP is not an ASA, it's actually a set of components, and probably it > includes several daemons. > > However, I think that modelling the ACP *neighbor discovery function* as an > ASA is correct - it will after all be using GRASP, and it will probably need to run > indefinitely because of handling new neighbors or neighbors that disappear. > It is also a user of one of the limited instances of GRASP (I can't remember > which one at this moment, while also listening to Bing's talk). The concrete question is whether we should document the ACP functional block in section 7.3 in the reference draft. I think you're suggesting to do so. In this case, can I ask you to provide some text? ;-) As mentioned, I'm not 100% convinced, but not opposed either. I'll then rename section 7.3 from "Specific ASAs for the Enrolment Process" to " Specific ASAs" Agree? Michael > Regards > Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > Anima@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
- [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but... Michael Behringer (mbehring)
- Re: [Anima] The ACP is not an ASA, but... Brian E Carpenter