IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-39: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Tue, 31 March 2020 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2EE3A1807; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yn5NLYPBAXRb; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFF43A1808; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809BF3897A; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:09:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5916716B; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:10:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra@ietf.org, anima-chairs@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de
In-Reply-To: <158561301296.11367.9776561744635554098@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <158561301296.11367.9776561744635554098@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:10:52 -0400
Message-ID: <4603.1585620652@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/KU3ZOR9RomvQ4aWVQzeTOgnpbbo>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-39: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 02:11:04 -0000


Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
    > Unfortunately, it seems that the "pinned-domain-cert" in the issued voucher
    > is the registrar's cert, not the CA cert.  (Given that the documented
    > workflow is

That's entirely correct.
The thing in the voucher validates the TLS connection that the pledge sees.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email