IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-09

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 14 November 2022 00:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54591C14F731; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 16:29:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKOzeWGThULm; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 16:29:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFEC1C14CE46; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 16:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [75.98.19.151]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F061F4AC; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:29:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA5F5A0B05; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 20:49:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B727AA0B04; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 21:49:19 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: =?utf-8?b?SsO8cmdlbiBTY2jDtm53w6RsZGVy?= <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy.all@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <164883335420.24992.11762904207626092789@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <164883335420.24992.11762904207626092789@ietfa.amsl.com>
Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?q?J=C3=BCrgen_Sch=C3=B6nw=C3=A4lder_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org> message dated "Fri, 01 Apr 2022 10:15:54 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 21:49:19 +0100
Message-ID: <805837.1668372559@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/R6-l6mwWBiM0ygl4g14lnLgciVE>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-09
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:29:36 -0000

Jürgen, you did a great review back in April.

We recently made a bunch of revisions to constrained-join-proxy.
In the end, we have replaced our custom "JPY" encapsulations with a CoAP
header.  The cost in the end is two bytes, and the result is that it is
identical to RFC9031.

We have also changed the MTI.

There is a diff in the DT, and I wonder if you'd take a look at that and give
us your opinion.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email