IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Anima] updates to XML for draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-41

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 22 May 2020 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FD33A0DA0; Thu, 21 May 2020 18:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cziPtpgwZl2E; Thu, 21 May 2020 18:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (minerva.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2a01:7e00::3d:b000]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C9903A0C3D; Thu, 21 May 2020 18:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:40:c840:256e:f31:f2f9]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 552621F449; Fri, 22 May 2020 01:40:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id CC3B41A329C; Thu, 21 May 2020 21:40:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra.all@ietf.org, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
In-reply-to: <f18fe6bc-3703-bcad-33ee-696f1b8ecae5@gmail.com>
References: <f18fe6bc-3703-bcad-33ee-696f1b8ecae5@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> message dated "Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:44:39 +1200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 21:40:20 -0400
Message-ID: <10693.1590111620@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/SNOFfJqdFOTpakc6AXlu0eQwfb8>
Subject: [Anima] updates to XML for draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-41
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 01:40:32 -0000

RFC-editor, the diffs against XML (v3) for this document can be found at:
   https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/commit/3b70d50bab007f90fed971fdcc48ca96482a8d46#diff-f0a44b214cc91a0645f06f65da3e26b6

WG: I have posted these changes to the github, and I could post the XML as
-42 if told to, but I don't want to confuse anyone.

There are a four missing trailing periods fixed, btw.
There is some change in the reference file for ietf-netconf-keystore, which I think
is the result of a bug in the reference.foobar files (out of my
control). See the line 5736 diff.
I don't think the reference file should have that <t>, but I think the
XML->TXT throws that out, but the XML is authoritative now...

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Again thanks to Michael Richardson, here are some important nits in the
    > GRASP examples in the BRSKI draft. The CDDL syntax is correct, but the
    > examples need to be corrected as below. The errors are in nesting
    > levels within the flood message, just two pairs of missing [].

I have updated the github and the generated XML (these examples were split
off into mostly easily maintained files).

tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote:
    > I note that part of the formal specification is in CDDL and while other
    > DDL - ASN.1, SMI, YANG - are bracketed with CODE BEGINS CODE ENDS - the
    > CDDL is not. I suspect that it should be - perhaps a note to the RFC
    > Editor is called for.

This mechanism is a homebrew insert-figures routine, and it didn't consider
CDDL.  I have renamed the files to .cddl, and adjusted the insert-figures.

    > In the Security Considerations I encounter MTIM which I suspect should
    > be MITM (and which needs expanding on first use in s.5).



    > In the YANG module, I see two references in square brackets which
    > suggests that they are in XML/HTML and not plain text whereas there is
    > a requirement for YANG modules to be in plain text so that they can be
    > extracted from the RFC.

If you are looking at the HTML-ized tools-version of the document, then it
expands all sorts of things.  All of the YANG is text as far as I can see.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email