[Anima] Sheng: Adoption for draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 06 February 2024 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF58C15152B; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:12:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HDYx9rBq1AQY; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A3D8C15198B; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:11:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TTrtF16HPznkKQ; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 19:11:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4TTrtF0BSCzkmlr; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 19:11:49 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 19:11:48 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn, rwilton@cisco.com
Cc: anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-brski-ae@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher@ietf.org
Message-ID: <ZcJ2ZLih2c2VEopY@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/XfjkPfOahHdTPbTVPY1N9-eUYtQ>
Subject: [Anima] Sheng: Adoption for draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 18:12:41 -0000

Dear Sheng,

On behalf of the co-authors, i would hereby like to ask for adoption of
draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery.

The draft is not about new, not-yet-adopted work, but instead it is coalescing
discovery options that we originally had started to write into different BRSKI variation
documents:

    draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm
    draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae
    draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-voucher
    draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-proxy

During the work on the discovery text for those drafts in the past year, it became
obvious that there was a lot of overlap and more text than woudl reasonably make sense
in every individual variation when it had to be duplicated across so many drafts.

We already have precedence of moving out text from one adopted ANIMA RFC into another
and adopting the second without another adoption call (draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll-03 ->
draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-00), and i think the same process would equally be appropriate here,
but if you think we need an adoption call, then i would like to ask for one on behalf of
the co-authors.

Also, i think we had good discussion about the document during IETF118, in our
side meetings and on the mailing list:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=%22draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery%22

Thank you!
    Toerless