Re: [Anima] Sheng: Adoption for draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery
Sheng JIANG <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn> Fri, 09 February 2024 08:02 UTC
Return-Path: <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2310FC14F6F3; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 00:02:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C35hO1LDBdtC; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 00:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpbgsg1.qq.com (smtpbgsg1.qq.com [54.254.200.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66BD5C14F603; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 00:02:10 -0800 (PST)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp77t1707465704t9p7h4l7
X-QQ-Originating-IP: X3jCsHXscs2GAOkKJS+WfRSccXQOdpVWbtfK3ptnCpg=
Received: from SJ-Uni ( [111.40.59.96]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:01:42 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 01400000000000J0Z000000A0000000
X-QQ-FEAT: v/I4QfEc9z363+Trpiea6xdau2GCW0JSiD6bbY2wpMx0ceQ465grjnJ4Wi41g JO7poAVF8f593F68HumSfL3XOp/Xfl94VnwtTs4OxK1W3rrWD1YLotEXn4MpkAfEhq1tmQm RGRMbKICTmh0cWgopFJhctXFVJSESBQYr6ZoE50EF/vBmJXX79CG8O5uXFQ3hITSdCQCbCy BjH+51SiJneNlzWF5U+qDClXJPHccNtXLrlr2swG6Cz1ZllAR7iEcbmIg8wtOqaJoqnDT7I v5sbrbJJvtysbe5V0EoUMXMnJdCMp9YfMdg8lROkeh5X1r4+1O8A6rhgicoxFe+tJKYXHJh o37j40wiDSkuFcFURIJ9sURpw3QvaF9A2ZznFme5nPLKHwAe0IJXl98GFs51ZzvM4E0f+O8 t9ORKJ3Xgrk=
X-QQ-GoodBg: 2
X-BIZMAIL-ID: 1289540551969387890
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:01:42 +0800
From: Sheng JIANG <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, rwilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: anima <anima@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery <draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm <draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-brski-ae <draft-ietf-brski-ae@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher <draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher@ietf.org>
References: <ZcJ2ZLih2c2VEopY@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: A0784A6A-B4AC-4103-9A12-00525B5BEBB4
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.228[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5100D69ACA28FCA1+202402091601419079836@bupt.edu.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:bupt.edu.cn:qybglogicsvrsz:qybglogicsvrsz4a-1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/olLNf3v4qbK_FtUl6gJkw7h4vBA>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Sheng: Adoption for draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 08:02:17 -0000
There is a reasonable good foundation for this document giving it is coalesced from parts of several relevant WG documents. I will launch the adoption call soon. Sheng JIANG >Dear Sheng, > >On behalf of the co-authors, i would hereby like to ask for adoption of >draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery. > >The draft is not about new, not-yet-adopted work, but instead it is coalescing >discovery options that we originally had started to write into different BRSKI variation >documents: > > draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm > draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae > draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-voucher > draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-proxy > >During the work on the discovery text for those drafts in the past year, it became >obvious that there was a lot of overlap and more text than woudl reasonably make sense >in every individual variation when it had to be duplicated across so many drafts. > >We already have precedence of moving out text from one adopted ANIMA RFC into another >and adopting the second without another adoption call (draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll-03 -> >draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-00), and i think the same process would equally be appropriate here, >but if you think we need an adoption call, then i would like to ask for one on behalf of >the co-authors. > >Also, i think we had good discussion about the document during IETF118, in our >side meetings and on the mailing list: > >https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=%22draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery%22 > >Thank you! > Toerless > >_______________________________________________ >Anima mailing list >Anima@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima >
- [Anima] Sheng: Adoption for draft-eckert-anima-br… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Anima] Sheng: Adoption for draft-eckert-anim… Sheng JIANG