IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Discovery of proxy/registrar insufficient (GRASP and more).

Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl> Mon, 02 May 2022 07:40 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21ED2C14F74F for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 00:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bbhmail.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBJXiYKgqlnL for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 00:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8EBFC14F725 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 May 2022 00:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omf11.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B84B2B3E1; Mon, 2 May 2022 07:39:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: stokcons@bbhmail.nl) by omf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D8FAB2002D; Mon, 2 May 2022 07:39:46 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 09:39:46 +0200
From: Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, anima@ietf.org
Reply-To: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
Mail-Reply-To: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
In-Reply-To: <18547.1651248473@localhost>
References: <YlWUA7xhMU2XtJsz@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <388791.1649870361@dooku> <Ymc57cpieDGAcn1X@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <e37c18efd6a17554eee9f2602dce2e9b@bbhmail.nl> <c4212393-42c2-3c54-30d0-bb7c6484b4db@gmail.com> <18547.1651248473@localhost>
Message-ID: <dcfe8ab74d6238a53f2857d919549987@bbhmail.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_b4f8d75ff9f7cc4f39a87bf670f7b298"
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D8FAB2002D
X-Stat-Signature: 74s5tfqxh58j3mbn1641t4qg9adhizni
X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout05
X-Session-Marker: 73746F6B636F6E73406262686D61696C2E6E6C
X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1/Y0NhfXe6a2dNA22l3/lA5MLfXbVGTH7E=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbhmail.nl; h=mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-type; s=key; bh=ZD3K64NDZZaNMsH9MGirKrIdkaGQ3coqTDZl4Ww45bU=; b=lk8EEOOrmPfQDhH9ezGAv6yDXCrudoz3yZBtf2XpPQCwlXab2qAkjUaxsELQeeDC0r4O678Fl28HEXFdTkXUl/OBQRCs3XeudZA3v0+ffbxG0Vs77h079Ba/nMaOxsExu6Vz7zNuYW5UXTnsEUmGRGAFwGBzXgDbPzEPi/QppQc=
X-HE-Tag: 1651477186-705159
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/bklgvd8VpkfERw-uVd72YIxdfQ8>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Discovery of proxy/registrar insufficient (GRASP and more).
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 07:40:00 -0000

  Changed accordingly.
Also objective value is used instead of objective name.

Peter
Michael Richardson schreef op 2022-04-29 18:07:

> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 26-Apr-22 19:02, Peter van der Stok wrote:
>>> HI,
>>> To add to the discussion, below the text that I adapted for Graps 
>>> discovery
>>> in contrsined-join-proxy draft.
>>> Comments are welcome, Corrections are encouraged.
> 
>> Are you intending to define a new GRASP objective "AN_REGISTRAR"? If 
>> so, you must be consistent (you have "AN_registrar" elsewhere) and you 
>> need an entry in IANA Considerations.
> 
>> Or are you just extending "AN_join_registrar" as defined in RFC8995? 
>> That
>> seems easier.
> 
> I thought we were going to extend AN_join_registrar.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT 
> consulting )
> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email