[Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10
Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 16 May 2022 23:09 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: anima@ietf.org
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F28FC079B37; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.2.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <165274254631.62630.11102982778020349578@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:09:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/t5dTOI3FMbbuCi8B_tyz6e1hjrY>
Subject: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 23:09:06 -0000
Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins Review result: Ready This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. This is a well-written specification. My only question - and I expect the answer will be “no” - is whether there is any concern that sizes of the resources that are being passed around might exceed the MTU between the pledge and the registrar, and whether there should be a mention of this possibility in the specification. Best, Spencer
- [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ani… Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker
- Re: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Peter van der Stok
- Re: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Esko Dijk
- Re: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Peter van der Stok
- Re: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Michael Richardson