[Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10

Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 16 May 2022 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: anima@ietf.org
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F28FC079B37; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.2.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <165274254631.62630.11102982778020349578@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:09:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/t5dTOI3FMbbuCi8B_tyz6e1hjrY>
Subject: [Anima] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 23:09:06 -0000

Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins
Review result: Ready

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

This is a well-written specification. My only question - and I expect the
answer will be “no” - is whether there is any concern that sizes of the
resources that are being passed around might exceed the MTU between the pledge
and the registrar, and whether there should be a mention of this possibility in
the specification.

Best,

Spencer