[Anima] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8994 (7558)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 15 January 2024 10:57 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC98DC14F5ED; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 02:57:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tn-uGPVyL4IH; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 02:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142CBC14F5E5; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 02:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id CB5831A49952; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 02:57:32 -0800 (PST)
To: william.atwood@concordia.ca, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com, sbjarnason@arbor.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240115105732.CB5831A49952@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 02:57:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/uHgGUaZIeVtk7LfttJm8CTEa3JM>
Subject: [Anima] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8994 (7558)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:57:37 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC8994, "An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7558 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: J. William Atwood <william.atwood@concordia.ca> Date Reported: 2023-07-02 Held by: Rob Wilton (IESG) Section: 6.2.1 Original Text ------------- ACP nodes MUST NOT support certificates with RSA public keys of less than a 2048-bit modulus or curves with group order of less than 256 bits. They MUST support certificates with RSA public keys with 2048-bit modulus and MAY support longer RSA keys. They MUST support certificates with ECC public keys using NIST P-256 curves and SHOULD support P-384 and P-521 curves. ACP nodes MUST NOT support certificates with RSA public keys whose modulus is less than 2048 bits, or certificates whose ECC public keys are in groups whose order is less than 256 bits. RSA signing certificates with 2048-bit public keys MUST be supported, and such certificates with longer public keys MAY be supported. ECDSA certificates using the NIST P-256 curve MUST be supported, and such certificates using the P-384 and P-521 curves SHOULD be supported. Corrected Text -------------- ACP nodes MUST NOT support certificates with RSA public keys whose modulus is less than 2048 bits, or certificates whose ECC public keys are in groups whose order is less than 256 bits. RSA signing certificates with 2048-bit public keys MUST be supported, and such certificates with longer public keys MAY be supported. ECDSA certificates using the NIST P-256 curve MUST be supported, and such certificates using the P-384 and P-521 curves SHOULD be supported. Notes ----- The second paragraph in the original text appears to be a more carefully-written version of the first paragraph. Therefore the first paragraph should be deleted and the second paragraph retained. -------------------------------------- RFC8994 (draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-30) -------------------------------------- Title : An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP) Publication Date : May 2021 Author(s) : T. Eckert, Ed., M. Behringer, Ed., S. Bjarnason Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Anima] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8994… RFC Errata System