IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7263)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 09 December 2022 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDACC14F722 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 07:21:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fe3jutLV5wJQ for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 07:21:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD9A3C1527B7 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 07:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 941B755D24; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 07:20:45 -0800 (PST)
To: pritikin@cisco.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, tte@cs.fau.de, shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rufus.buschart@siemens.com, anima@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221209152045.941B755D24@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 07:20:45 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/wO3vNqhbiYS0LTdeNWzg1pyKlX4>
Subject: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7263)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 15:21:50 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995,
"Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7263

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Rufus Buschart <rufus.buschart@siemens.com>

Section: 5.5

Original Text
-------------
idevid-issuer:  The Issuer value from the pledge IDevID certificate
  is included to ensure unique interpretation of the serial-number.
  In the case of a nonceless (offline) voucher-request, an
  appropriate value needs to be configured from the same out-of-band
  source as the serial-number.


Corrected Text
--------------
idevid-issuer:  The Issuer value from the pledge IDevID certificate
  SHOULD BE included to ensure unique interpretation of the serial-
  number.
  In the case of a nonceless (offline) voucher-request, an
  appropriate value MUST be configured from the same out-of-band
  source as the serial-number.


Notes
-----
The current language is no language according to RFC 2119.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)
Publication Date    : May 2021
Author(s)           : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email