IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] WG input needed: Ben Campbell's question on GRASP (2)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 01 June 2017 03:54 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8F6129C5C; Wed, 31 May 2017 20:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J42qw5gTZ9VM; Wed, 31 May 2017 20:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com (mail-pf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C867C1294CF; Wed, 31 May 2017 20:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id f27so6094756pfe.0; Wed, 31 May 2017 20:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=c6MO5F7s0x7LMFejKKuDCIhJ7PNvu850/LXK8X/v/Lo=; b=uSOmcRdJ0/JCHIyEVJivvWQjkRXf8feGTebbnW2KOBUUslqwmR0d/4/CV8BLg2k1gi w8PiUKQHn1x2sRLVC0Lo0CEdq2buZ+c4fACc9VPTIwpf7MMftRA6dWfJZocQAXOc9LQl RRPVhpVmLGssyl4XcfxdsRrdoEtean13vEZtaiHEWbN8aD5hVUp4ShL8+Kq+LjksJjwW ZQlW1Hm8BaohYysvrDf9LfOMT7ou1n/4l6g6CC+hA9By0L8EiIGHvFTcnOmzTzrK00R5 QihwqsaW0YX2upLFOvZdyBNCryoB8CVHttuw+kSXZPkZpmmMJAJTuQiehhN8r/oSFlLl dyeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c6MO5F7s0x7LMFejKKuDCIhJ7PNvu850/LXK8X/v/Lo=; b=TWcgxuXqX0PqiRGvGqdH4RJNufMU7ZpAJzehsvhGB94C8R1L6pH00C77oj4JRw46FM h/bMLyTZhDsAy37VQsj4KK76EzrdCvz/PpbgPfTKk97zpQfen9iDUI/fxHbBEsJeKKP/ H6XHyhxiQU9nThfVKVvLHQsUvtilmkw6pqRQSBzsJffNFEhkQkBfZT4WkYfZyurCtSUW L4YncpmfENmaAEgDJOlGMIfeR2U5K5yvuYKg3Zy1ge+JRmpNsOFPmD1hqvbGEWqmPGsB lMKKEHzbH1fkIy+b3OT1vEWNSzJNZMWgMNdeYdMmbtYF74ELXe5RqotIm4v8tDXml18k sdEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCulAwszf569BxpYXsIdC7AUG9baSGbl6EXvr/VfVe1wS0QAxX1 awuKYUFuHLvZ0p/3
X-Received: by 10.98.59.212 with SMTP id w81mr1021181pfj.107.1496289247279; Wed, 31 May 2017 20:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e001:5618:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e001:5618:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m80sm31712750pfg.107.2017.05.31.20.54.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 May 2017 20:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-anima-grasp@ietf.org, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, anima-chairs@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
References: <149550272234.507.6666100470577050600.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <19f8e94f-fe08-f1e8-53f5-6852953690e3@gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <d26ab945-bb5e-2b89-a41c-524179dd2d8c@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 15:54:09 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19f8e94f-fe08-f1e8-53f5-6852953690e3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/zA_zRUad3-XCNpqoBkIHZQOQCoA>
Subject: Re: [Anima] WG input needed: Ben Campbell's question on GRASP (2)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 03:54:13 -0000

On 29/05/2017 16:02, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 23/05/2017 13:25, Ben Campbell wrote:
> ...
>> - Is section 2 [Requirements] expected to be useful to implementers once this is> published as an RFC? Unless there's a reason otherwise, I would suggest
>> moving this to an appendix, or even removing it entirely. As it is, you
>> have to wade through an unusual amount of front material before you get
>> to the meat of the protocol.
> 
> I'm open to that, and you are not the only reader with that comment.
> But we'd need WG consent...

I'm not hearing much from the WG but since several new readers have made
this comment, my proposal is to move the requirements into an Appendix.
If we don't like the look of it when done, we can always move them
back again.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email