Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-02

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 15 February 2013 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0869B21F8777 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:56:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kw4o8FIUjMKq for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-f49.google.com (mail-vb0-f49.google.com [209.85.212.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D7021F8770 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id s24so2249331vbi.8 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:56:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2OpD0CJ4afFQ2Yu1UWg5hNRXdw8Ys0VeIMlLbNDm7N8=; b=RUfVvaU/PLFS0TwQqqvRlr7OVBvA6Km/41ODnZY4Zri2NB0ABXjseNDjpM9Em7smiY D1MrTZWzRFclwLMkvPpWtcOsfNa3vSdJ+cASgdN2Idfceq4dmHcG1uL42QM0LSfYQ/a6 9JocIBcuw2UZ6n0hC2goQTDNlPgj8viG36sg0SUP2divxf+91ausTq6jpAe0ZZP4c9lb BPfAHoa2v1YdH2cixUEB1iouusbsbK+q4SuaSbNETN/gsxVmzPTHskF0s/8dyql3G2Fu ZKoafrbqkz3gBRZSJ4uf8zC8xocvQfhFzsI/jYmTsNbrK6gEGuNbAXCUWn3y/omEcO0+ m6aw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.151.5 with SMTP id a5mr4183849vcw.22.1360947408716; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:56:48 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.59.3.41 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:56:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511DAC57.3010809@stpeter.im>
References: <511DAC57.3010809@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:56:48 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MAwC9s6bEn-xzKbZrpKUh_Rq6Ww
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBaPpiBSNd=mx0JY0LWJqbPut7j3-t=5z_tki7+B5rx-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:56:50 -0000

> Does the specification truly and substantively update RFC 2648 and RFC
> 3553? It appears to clarify the names and organization of the relevant
> IANA registrations, but not to modify the substance of those earlier RFCs.

Robert Sparks has filed a DISCUSS ballot on the same issue.  I believe
it does, though the IESG is not clear about what "updates" means
(something we're working on).  I'll reply in more detail on Robert's
DISCUSS, and include apps-discuss in my reply.

Barry