IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] webfinger privacy question/suggestion

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Wed, 31 October 2012 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C9E21F87F3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.275
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.275 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.324, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XoMHjHojeU6z for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C292F21F87FE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sydney (rrcs-98-101-148-48.midsouth.biz.rr.com [98.101.148.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9VJQc0k018271 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:26:38 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1351711599; bh=nLnCN7g5AfFuvYNrd7v5BtMDFB10LIK6TG35HLtXGsY=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QJmsdA8lMRCoELAMtFaFCU/CKgwTqXW8ZK10TfC06BQxJAtlLJFrWrNZXdiNYNTYV x6cVOiXgPCvhVwXuv2RJ3JN/MF/qXlv6QKb7b19O1GpP+viKHu2pCkuz9MWfmJuYKb JCPEzccVoMAVbeqgUrkeVwL68kq/nTw7lmXq0zF0=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, 'SM' <sm@resistor.net>
References: <508E66FB.4070708@cs.tcd.ie> <0b3b01cdb61c$981dc600$c8595200$@packetizer.com> <508F0870.9050402@cs.tcd.ie> <0b9901cdb636$bf951480$3ebf3d80$@packetizer.com> <508F2B78.2000006@cs.tcd.ie> <0be001cdb64b$eb574560$c205d020$@packetizer.com> <508FA55F.5020608@cs.tcd.ie> <5FC89052-EE84-4C80-BEE8-ABAD7C784F5A@gmx.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20121030093556.0a82b130@resistor.net> <00ee01cdb701$7a68ef00$6f3acd00$@packetizer.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121030230234.0b40f3c8@resistor.net> <5090EC8D.5050900@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <5090EC8D.5050900@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:26:43 -0400
Message-ID: <001e01cdb79d$a9a231e0$fce695a0$@packetizer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFLsjjsRNcR0N0rPY8CMxV87xY2TQDs4XE+AookvBECZOavfwEZKXCrAUbsN9ACb4OCXQI3fPywAU9o2S8CEskaJQFYBz0XAdg6dGKYPCmdwA==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] webfinger privacy question/suggestion
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:26:43 -0000

Stephen,

> Maybe we should try get a few folks who care about this into a huddle in
> ATL if some of those who're interested will be there? (If the Sunday
> reception worked then on Monday morning Paul might be able to say
> something more than "we have insane privacy nuts" :-)

Now that was funny ...

I'll be around most of the week and would be happy to take whatever text
folks want to provide and insert it into the document.  I really am at a
loss for words on this.  I do not know what to write.  While I don't share
the same privacy concerns, I do respect those who have privacy concerns.

I don't think anyone is insane, though.  I tend to use exaggerated language,
but I'm really more down-to-earth than that language might suggest. ;-)

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email