Re: [apps-discuss] Call for WG Adoption: draft-nottingham-uri-get-off-my-lawn
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 30 August 2013 00:31 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D062121F938E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.461
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.461 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.862, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8FgpIUyqykI for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAA221F937E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (unknown [118.209.225.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D65EA50A88; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:31:03 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZ3m7Z3a5mSCNw3XKSD41twbJa-NwCp9LHfQ_ku=_MgXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:31:01 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1501FCB6-B39B-4A2E-8C89-B9C96A788E7C@mnot.net>
References: <CAL0qLwZ3m7Z3a5mSCNw3XKSD41twbJa-NwCp9LHfQ_ku=_MgXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for WG Adoption: draft-nottingham-uri-get-off-my-lawn
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:31:11 -0000
I'd hope it can be quick; maybe just after Vancouver? Cheers, On 30/08/2013, at 4:40 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote: > There appears to be some good support for processing this through APPSAWG, so let's make this a formal call for adoption. If there's no sustained objection in the next couple of weeks, we'll make it a work item. > > Would anyone like to propose a milestone (month/year for IESG handoff)? > > -MSK, APPSAWG co-chair > _______________________________________________ > apps-discuss mailing list > apps-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- [apps-discuss] Call for WG Adoption: draft-nottin… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Call for WG Adoption: draft-no… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] Call for WG Adoption: draft-no… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Call for WG Adoption: draft-no… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Call for WG Adoption: draft-no… Mark Nottingham