IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call for WG Adoption: draft-nottingham-uri-get-off-my-lawn

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sun, 01 September 2013 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895EE11E82BD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.550, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32k9Smzg7MUe for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4731A11E82BC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (unknown [118.209.199.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8851522E1F3; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:52:05 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwh0+7sWucTN10kmSbxbpXdr-i41zH_wApa1SWO7Drz9Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 09:52:02 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AB32256C-9B99-4EFE-870E-64D9366E11BC@mnot.net>
References: <CAL0qLwZ3m7Z3a5mSCNw3XKSD41twbJa-NwCp9LHfQ_ku=_MgXg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwh0+7sWucTN10kmSbxbpXdr-i41zH_wApa1SWO7Drz9Mw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for WG Adoption: draft-nottingham-uri-get-off-my-lawn
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 23:52:17 -0000

Examples would definitely be helpful. I'd be inclined to use fictitious ones.

Cheers,


On 30/08/2013, at 10:02 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> There appears to be some good support for processing this through APPSAWG, so let's make this a formal call for adoption.  If there's no sustained objection in the next couple of weeks, we'll make it a work item.
> 
> Would anyone like to propose a milestone (month/year for IESG handoff)?
> 
> -MSK, APPSAWG co-chair
> 
> 
> I support it but would like to see some more concrete examples of the offending URIs
> 
>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> Website: http://hallambaker.com/
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email