[apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-nottingham-http-problem

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD821A02DD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZYcR4Q-HO_6L for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4151A00FA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so4360354wiv.1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MeiiRfGARijt5xMqYowtSb1ePSgmp8A0pos0p7DYvPk=; b=Ab0dCBgO1J08t+WXOtRlWpHC8sNQVi4eQ+1KFgSSK4wGTRWLFzsRMRcc8Y7+/hfas8 MkHosBQXYr/QDxmwGV5ysCwMj0EcHdPM9v+oSxjOIyFSCxzOW+t1Q0VMzyEJV09lNMpu zHJIsAuCn+KeonGwnTfubzayInYD1gBBEMrN1U3kWNFuPU67jNG1QAjYBNjyS6rz3NqH 2JKphtg8wQMhG+jIEHq9K4Qa/2A/IuR6DxwJ5g3xIyIMg5pxoNA6SqqaLVD+S7EZ/4W8 MW3D5sOsUpvLJ/dv90gSDrVvav/X6S10cDO+52nO/xBQzF9cSvFpBcd9BvmKrbucMrkI MpmA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.81.234 with SMTP id d10mr5911826wiy.79.1405960321895; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.10.99 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:32:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbYA3LLc31gsEAKn2Cf+ea_mkKk765Bd2o0GG9+d_GkUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d044281348e142804feb6a56a"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/2AI4dwxLgScBGax1n8mBBJ0qdm4
Subject: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-nottingham-http-problem
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:32:06 -0000

Call For Adoption: draft-nottingham-http-problem

Colleagues,

This note begins a Call For Adoption for the above document to be adopted
as an APPSAWG working group item.  The Call ends on August 8, 2014.

Keep in mind that adoption of a document does not mean the document as-is
is ready for publication.  It is merely acceptance of the document as a
starting point for what will be some later final product of APPSAWG.  The
working group is free to make changes to the document according to the
normal consensus process.

There was some favorable discussion toward adoption of this document at
IETF 90 in Toronto.  We will factor this into the decision at the close of
this Call.

Please reply on this thread with expressions of support or opposition,
preferably with comments, regarding accepting this as a work item of
APPSAWG (as opposed to some other venue).  Feel free to include discussion
of constraints that the WG should consider with respect to its mini-charter.

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair