Re: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-nottingham-http-problem

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sun, 03 August 2014 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4867B1A0B05 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 11:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bURykFQu4qlx for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 11:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5A91A0538 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 11:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1407090249; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=8W5QwCM/eYaM1k3XKElpnrVQ8oOR27EO69HBO5bMTnw=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=PG8IL+IvTFqYGZ8DLnXm2o0GrnnRFsPJAw8LrMmWmu4cxdgQT3WdO0/yqCz0zP0Q2bftTn H1V5I7gbLJT6jWmD4Z92K4WzGxFjyzkOjCP4NL4uR7FxBkilj4SDgLjWyKS9HWORwkw3JI 0Ds0vYgm9pSOPqe61VEqA8meWVXjbpg=;
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (cpc5-nmal20-2-0-cust24.19-2.cable.virginm.net [92.234.84.25]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <U95-SQAvQyJD@waldorf.isode.com>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 19:24:09 +0100
Message-ID: <53DE7DA1.6060806@isode.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 19:21:21 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <CAL0qLwbYA3LLc31gsEAKn2Cf+ea_mkKk765Bd2o0GG9+d_GkUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbYA3LLc31gsEAKn2Cf+ea_mkKk765Bd2o0GG9+d_GkUw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/Eh2KPEV0XfsCoMWT95ROEPGqOzc
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call For Adoption: draft-nottingham-http-problem
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 18:24:12 -0000

On 21/07/2014 17:32, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Call For Adoption: draft-nottingham-http-problem
>
> Colleagues,
>
> This note begins a Call For Adoption for the above document to be 
> adopted as an APPSAWG working group item.  The Call ends on August 8, 
> 2014.
Colleagues,
There was very little support for this document so far. Are people 
interested in working on this document in the APPSAWG?

Thank you,
Alexey, as a co-chair.
>
> Keep in mind that adoption of a document does not mean the document 
> as-is is ready for publication.  It is merely acceptance of the 
> document as a starting point for what will be some later final product 
> of APPSAWG.  The working group is free to make changes to the document 
> according to the normal consensus process.
>
> There was some favorable discussion toward adoption of this document 
> at IETF 90 in Toronto.  We will factor this into the decision at the 
> close of this Call.
>
> Please reply on this thread with expressions of support or opposition, 
> preferably with comments, regarding accepting this as a work item of 
> APPSAWG (as opposed to some other venue). Feel free to include 
> discussion of constraints that the WG should consider with respect to 
> its mini-charter.