IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Device URNs

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 23 February 2012 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF0421F876A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:26:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.541
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MCtJArJzOLty for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:26:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F5421F872B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:26:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447A42DA06; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:26:14 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m9j87kXj0LSM; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:26:13 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776C72CC3C; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:26:13 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4F46AEF4.2000503@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:26:12 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <4F463F5C.7020104@piuha.net> <4F4685DC.6080801@stpeter.im> <4F46861E.6030001@stpeter.im> <4F4695FB.5090607@piuha.net> <4F46A4A5.9040500@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4F46A4A5.9040500@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Device URNs
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:26:16 -0000

Peter,

> I think you were missing the point of my message:

Ah, sorry :-)

> that administered
> uniqueness is not necessary

that I agree with

>   so urn:dev:cgi is OK.
>
> And yes, eventually it would be good for you to post about this I-D to
> the urn-nid mailing list:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid
>

Will do.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email