IETF Logo Mail Archive

[apps-discuss] SenML

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 23 February 2012 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D0021F84B9 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:24:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.342
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.342 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, TVD_SPACED_SUBJECT_WORD3=2.412, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qZUY1+yn6MI5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:24:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E46D21F84A7 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:24:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF902DA06; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:24:21 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBZji2MVgF6m; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:24:21 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3602E2CC3C; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:24:21 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4F464C15.6010006@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:24:21 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Subject: [apps-discuss] SenML
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:24:23 -0000

Hello again,

This is another draft that we'd like to get feedback on. It is yet another component that the authors have used in their work around small and smart devices. The goal is to define a base data format that sensors and other Internet of Things devices can easily use, preferably without having to define entirely new schemes and different structures just to measure a slightly different thing.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jennings-senml-08

The abstract says:

    This specification defines media types for representing simple sensor
    measurements and device parameters in the Sensor Markup Language
    (SenML).  Representations are defined in JavaScript Object Notation
    (JSON), eXtensible Markup Language (XML) and Efficient XML
    Interchange (EXI), which share the common SenML data model.  A simple
    sensor, such as a temperature sensor, could use this media type in
    protocols such as HTTP or CoAP to transport the measurements of the
    sensor or to be configured.

Comments appreciated. Necessary? Correctly defined? Improvement suggestions?

Jari

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status