[apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7293 (4771)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 10 August 2016 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17EE12D737 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.849
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m9D9gyIGlcLj for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803C612D5D1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 62815B80D04; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: wmills_92105@yahoo.com, msk@fb.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, superuser@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160810145957.62815B80D04@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:59:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/6TP6z3GrPdfAy1BdcKSpZuPDqY8>
Cc: kandersen@linkedin.com, apps-discuss@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7293 (4771)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:59:59 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7293,
"The Require-Recipient-Valid-Since Header Field and SMTP Service Extension".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Kurt Andersen <kandersen@linkedin.com>

Section: 3.2

Original Text
"date-time" is defined in Section 3.3, and "addr-spec" is 
defined in Section 3.4.1 of [MAIL].

Corrected Text
"date-time" is defined in Section 3.3 of [MAIL], and 
"addr-spec" is defined in Section 3.4.1 of [MAIL].

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7293#page-6 links the "Section 3.3" reference to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7293#section-3.3 instead of the correct https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.3.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC7293 (draft-ietf-appsawg-rrvs-header-field-11)
Title               : The Require-Recipient-Valid-Since Header Field and SMTP Service Extension
Publication Date    : July 2014
Author(s)           : W. Mills, M. Kucherawy
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Applications Area Working Group APP
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG