Re: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7293 (4771)
Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> Wed, 10 August 2016 22:05 UTC
Return-Path: <mferguson@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445CD12D899 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hTlRZH9GqmbI for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8307912D891 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7491E5A3A; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xa-6R27k7JR0; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (cpe-76-174-176-44.socal.res.rr.com [76.174.176.44]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C22FA1E5A35; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160810145957.62815B80D04@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:05:17 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2094713D-EEC1-45E4-A112-19AEC8DB00C0@amsl.com>
References: <20160810145957.62815B80D04@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/IOk47G1_5S-rXnSxmEDF8kfapfU>
Cc: ben@nostrum.com, apps-discuss@ietf.org, msk@fb.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, kandersen@linkedin.com, wmills_92105@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7293 (4771)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:05:27 -0000
All, Please note that this errata report has been removed. As stated at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php: "Errata are for the RFCs as available from rfc-editor.org. We have sent separate mail regarding this error to webmaster@tools.ietf.org. Thank you. RFC Editor/mf On Aug 10, 2016, at 7:59 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7293, > "The Require-Recipient-Valid-Since Header Field and SMTP Service Extension". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7293&eid=4771 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Kurt Andersen <kandersen@linkedin.com> > > Section: 3.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > "date-time" is defined in Section 3.3, and "addr-spec" is > defined in Section 3.4.1 of [MAIL]. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > "date-time" is defined in Section 3.3 of [MAIL], and > "addr-spec" is defined in Section 3.4.1 of [MAIL]. > > Notes > ----- > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7293#page-6 links the "Section 3.3" reference to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7293#section-3.3 instead of the correct https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.3. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7293 (draft-ietf-appsawg-rrvs-header-field-11) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The Require-Recipient-Valid-Since Header Field and SMTP Service Extension > Publication Date : July 2014 > Author(s) : W. Mills, M. Kucherawy > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Applications Area Working Group APP > Area : Applications > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- Re: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RF… Megan Ferguson
- [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC729… RFC Errata System