Re: [apps-discuss] Applications Area Directorate review of draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-dpa-etal-00

[Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Thanks for doing the review, Ted.
>
>> RFC 4271 says that additions to the relevant IANA registry require
>> either standards action or must follow an early allocation policy (RFC
>> 4020).
>> It does not specify the requirements for deprecation; if the IESG
>> believes that standards action is also required for deprecation, then
>> this document should be updated to standards track.
>
> And, indeed, on 21 Feb a second last-call notice was sent out with
> this annotation:
>
>> This document was previously Last Called as Informational. However it
>> deprecates codepoints that were created by Standards Track documents.
>> It is therefore being re Last Called as a Proposed Standard. The
>> text change to PS is provided via an RFC Editor Note in the tracker.
>
> Barry, who would have rather seen it done by a management action

Great, thanks for the note; I had missed the second last call.

Ted