[apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Sun, 10 March 2013 04:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F6A21F87E0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 20:23:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id saNTMWlgff4a for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 20:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8717E21F87D3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 20:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (dhcp-46aa.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.70.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 312728A031 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:23:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:22:50 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20130310042250.GE33497@mx1.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: [apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:23:15 -0000

Dear colleagues,

In the APPSAWG meeting on Monday, the chairs have asked me to take
five minutes on the subject: topic.  I thought I'd better send a note
in preparation.

ICANN is in the process of awarding a little under 2000 new TLDs.
Inspired, I believe, partly by that fact, Phill Hallam-Baker suggested
a new DNS RRTYPE that would identify a name as a public suffix.
Unfortunately, he fell ill and didn't have a chance to submit a draft
on this.

I'm opposed to that particular idea, however, because I think I have
proposed a more generic mechanism that would still work just as well
for that use case, and also allow future refinements.  I've outlined
that mechanism in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-02.

I won't have any slides on Monday; I really just want to learn the
following:

    1.  Do people think this is work that needs to be done?

    2.  Do either of the above proposals seem like a good starting
    point?

    3.  If so, who is willing to do work on this (by reviewing and so
    on).  

(3) is especially important to me, because I received rather too
little feedback on the draft I offered to think that anyone else is
interested in pursuing it.  If people are interested in that draft,
I'm certainly prepared to continue working on it.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com