IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 12 March 2013 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B985421F8C85 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hfn0y-KJsnnp for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D506821F8B98 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.84.195] (unknown [130.129.84.195]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8ACF40725; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:39:18 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <513F9076.4000707@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:30:46 -0400
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
References: <20130310042250.GE33497@mx1.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20130310042250.GE33497@mx1.yitter.info>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:30:46 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/9/13 11:22 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> 1.  Do people think this is work that needs to be done?

Yes. The public suffix list must die.

> 2.  Do either of the above proposals seem like a good starting 
> point?

I'll need time to read your draft in more detail before forming an
opinion. What is the other proposal?

> 3.  If so, who is willing to do work on this (by reviewing and so 
> on).

I am willing to review and provide feedback.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=vRUR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email