IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE3311E80D7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gU6mAhLRxpjv for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BAA11E81DE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (dhcp-2430.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.36.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 071508A031 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:04:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:04:13 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20130314200412.GE50106@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <83AFF07DE0F646C0860A0631F973E9D1@LENOVO47E041CF> <20130313144321.37307.qmail@joyce.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130313144321.37307.qmail@joyce.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:04:16 -0000

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:43:21PM -0000, John Levine wrote:
> * Variants: state that two parallel names are under the same management (has
> issues different from the previous three)

I'd like _not_ to include this as a target.  I can see how this trick
could be abused to help that problem, but the discussion upthread
about cross-domain linkages and the potential for load in the DNS
suggests to me that this is the wrong mechanism.

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email