IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"

Hugo Salgado <hsalgado@nic.cl> Wed, 13 March 2013 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <hsalgado@nic.cl>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03E221F8E11 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BIacyRPDO5to for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cl (mail.nic.cl [IPv6:2001:1398:1::6008]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD5321F8C5C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nic.cl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0ACCC829E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:56:59 -0300 (CLST)
Received: from vulcano.intra.nic.cl (unknown [IPv6:2001:1398:4:1:172:30:10:58]) by mail.nic.cl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5775FCC829B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:56:59 -0300 (CLST)
Message-ID: <5140BDEB.8080203@nic.cl>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:56:59 -0300
From: Hugo Salgado <hsalgado@nic.cl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20130313144321.37307.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130313144321.37307.qmail@joyce.lan>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
OpenPGP: id=B525FA6E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on Wed Mar 13 14:56:59 2013 -0300 (CLST)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:57:01 -0000

On 03/13/2013 11:43 AM, John Levine wrote:
>> I am still not very clear about what the problem is and what the possilbe solution is.
>>
>> Could you kindly summarize it in one or two sentences ?
> 
> I agree that use cases would help a lot.  The ones I'm aware of are:
> 
> * Web cookies: limit how high up the DNS tree a site can promote its cookies.
> 
> * DMARC and other mail authentication: find policy documents for a
> domain given one of its subdomains
> 
> * SSL/TLS certificates: prevent certificate issue for names at or above public
> delegation points
> 
> * Variants: state that two parallel names are under the same management (has
> issues different from the previous three)

Also from Firefox browser:

* domain highlighting in the URL bar

* restricting the setting of the document.domain property (DOM
  same-origin policy)

Hugo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email