[apps-discuss] Status of "Spam reporting using IMAP: SREP" draft

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 29 June 2012 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0350121F8812 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.985
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.386, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NLjIJfjikkBh for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (cl-125.lon-03.gb.sixxs.net [IPv6:2a00:14f0:e000:7c::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254DE21F87AE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1340994559; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=JIMT2PJfoTYp7AUrrdLwVzLl7ZXhyfSEIV+qfj1WF3Y=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=BZMVbADWFxLY7TYTZI2BaH9ZiOcM577cAfCIjvEnrpn2C7ligmKUFN/wNRUhTAbrIKt4vr Cupw5oL3i+QSXRkVNXSv1LAswIwqMOs0fsstwDxrqBf0H6EjR6N9RYTcE05bxelpZ9bM0E +yhwX8CID8t9c4OpfdDDwGKbU7XhJ9o=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <T-3z=gAkRKvv@waldorf.isode.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:29:19 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <4FEDF40F.8020903@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:29:35 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [apps-discuss] Status of "Spam reporting using IMAP: SREP" draft
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:29:36 -0000

Dear WG participants,
Some time ago WG chairs have issues acceptance call for:
  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap-02

I think WG Chairs failed to emphasize that RIM filed an IPR declaration 
on the document:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1609/

Chairs would like to confirm that the WG is still interested in working 
on the document in presence of this IPR declaration.

Thank you,
Alexey, as an APPSAWG co-chair