IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement-04

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Wed, 02 May 2012 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F4421E8056 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 12:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXas+dgM+MPx for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 12:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A7111E809D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 12:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.11]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q42JS2cM006448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 May 2012 14:28:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q42JS118006844 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 May 2012 14:28:02 -0500
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id q42JS0nT020718; Wed, 2 May 2012 14:28:01 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4FA18BF6.3080704@bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 14:33:10 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@velocix.com>, Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>
References: <CBC4A8C0.343C5%ben@velocix.com>
In-Reply-To: <CBC4A8C0.343C5%ben@velocix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.11
Cc: "draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement-04
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 19:28:07 -0000

On 04/30/2012 03:03 PM, Ben Niven-Jenkins wrote:
> Francois, Vijay,
>
> See below for responses/comments and see attached for the current working
> text.  [...]

Ben, Francois: Thanks for addressing my review in the manner you
suggested.

I have no further comments on the draft.  It is good to go from my side.

Ciao,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email