IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR rdraft-ietf-pcp-base-22

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 14 February 2012 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0771E21F876E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:19:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vc3OJSlxZ0aR for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F0921F8675 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.238.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1E3JHWX016163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:19:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1329189570; i=@elandsys.com; bh=IYVCTuclsklxBd8C0JCRn6VLSoZaKeC4u9nkDiWTCEs=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=M6o0eNWSUIyF3SFcpu+9+8Yh/IWrWfo8njMT8VSUD05WBsHirYNfBI8lh2G0ViWEJ 2f8KOBLyLSjVeUfwMbQfICW2KrNm/bRtAgBn1SeAif1tpIDrrQy/JCgbRgLKjJ485X 22THw6HPJsR+xeZDg7gIYL7UZALD8daIAiG7uOLw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1329189570; i=@elandsys.com; bh=IYVCTuclsklxBd8C0JCRn6VLSoZaKeC4u9nkDiWTCEs=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=46w2u5f3kUB+j9ssl3+oPL70CvvT4VYmEH/DLousnzShf6n/G8tAMZfSSPy4ohECn XVtsImUlpaCZ+3lQTtuAhWEmp0vGPyGueRjkpZF9a5zYBLD5XRj+O9iv1oiKU+ijTk tt1mi476UFKh2/zjCc5ujOzQNVjgia1DWb4PSEug=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120213191423.0ae30480@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:18:43 -0800
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <0a5701cceab4$f723c070$e56b4150$@com>
References: <4F3592E5.3080707@bell-labs.com> <0a5701cceab4$f723c070$e56b4150$@com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR rdraft-ietf-pcp-base-22
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:19:34 -0000

Hi Dan,
At 17:07 13-02-2012, Dan Wing wrote:
>I attempted to search for the phrase, and for ::ffff:0:0 and :ffff:0.0.0.0,
>and found no existing RFC using either notation to indicate "all-zeros
>address".  So, this is the first.

Would RFC 5952 be of help?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email