Re: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-01.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 17 April 2013 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1F121F8E3C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFVkQaBj6hnJ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C1421F8E04 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hq17so1624663wib.5 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RFC1Sk4R7lTITXf5/8vkfaZCDKp+ffuwYCmjnQmQ+0I=; b=PCJRiydlGnC0DdEBL3Qj1B8FK0cYlEsjiBqyuRYOIIg7wBji+8fhPrRMmJYiu7WBT7 FsgEjXYvJT+2fFzjYYC90R/NP9f9959KMBBs/hr8f0zz6aKkXZOKvDfVEp1PPVzmwpQV yo7CkfVPD+fY7Ll+kO4cq9bM5U13nOarIZcdtebWa6nlCArjC9H6YxYS79SdPNhGz4hs LWig1wg90laXCvJI/Lzp5Bh8/M5rZDW8umZ2w7KQIA92x6ar5QJQvL1uWGDqAKOmEllU GAv+puX+WN4W1W9mRX9wFNCNHVwK2ShH/03vuWWIyu/DEaTvkMDidFfNOk+Gu2PSoj6n YKIg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.37.73 with SMTP id w9mr6375438wij.32.1366209682943; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.36.176 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <516e8a54.45f7440a.7dcc.1253SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
References: <516e8a54.45f7440a.7dcc.1253SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:41:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwb+9CYnOYw9kcMdzZvyPagcUrhxUkmOiMZNAXpzFe6MYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f502ee8d73a5e04da8f7ade
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:41:30 -0000

This document creates a registry, so I'm fairly certain it needs to go
through the IETF Stream, which means an Area Director has to sponsor it or
a working group has to adopt it.  On the other hand, although Independent
Submission stream drafts can't create registry entries when the registry
has certain constraints, I couldn't find anything constraining registry
creation.  Someone should check my math here.

You could ask this working group if it's interested in working on the
document for starters.

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair


On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Markus Lanthaler
<markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>wrote;wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've just uploaded a new version of my I-D which incorporates Dave
> Cridland's feedback. Thanks again!
>
> Since this is my first I-D I'm not familiar with the processes yet. If my
> understanding of RFC2026 & RFC4846 is correct, the next step would be to
> send a publication request to the RFC editor. Or do I have to contact the
> Area Directors because the document requires IANA allocations?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Markus
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 1:21 PM
> To: mail@markus-lanthaler.com
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-01.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Markus Lanthaler and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:        draft-lanthaler-profile-registry
> Revision:        01
> Title:           The IETF Profile URI Registry
> Creation date:   2013-04-17
> Group:           Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 6
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-01.txt
> Status:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lanthaler-profile-registry
> Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-01
> Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lanthaler-profile-registry-01
>
> Abstract:
>    This document defines a registry for profile URIs and establishes an
>    IETF URN Sub-namespace to be used in specifications standardizing
>    profiles.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>