IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-appswg-xdash-03

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Sun, 11 March 2012 03:38 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8430321F85EA; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:38:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deN-CIUTRBag; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:38:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BC821F85AE; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:38:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1331437085; x=1362973085; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4F5C1E10.6000909@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20Sa t,=2010=20Mar=202012=2021:37:52=20-0600|From:=20Pete=20Re snick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20<dcrocker@bbiw.net>|CC:=20Dave =20Crocker=20<dhc@dcrocker.net>,=20John=20C=20Klensin=20< klensin@jck.com>,=0D=0A=09<draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash.all@t ools.ietf.org>,=20Peter=20Saint-Andre=0D=0A=09<stpeter@st peter.im>,=20<apps-discuss@ietf.org>,=20The=20IESG=20<ies g@ietf.org>|Subject:=20Re:=20[apps-discuss]=20APPSDIR=20r eview=20of=20draft-ietf-appswg-xdash-03|References:=20<62 FF481C5AD21C3F683CD2B9@PST.JCK.COM>=09<4F5B9FF5.7040209@d crocker.net>=20<4F5BA20D.30304@qualcomm.com>=09<B47E8B2B6 E9CA7E84099E605@PST.JCK.COM>=20<4F5C1CCE.6020706@dcrocker .net>|In-Reply-To:=20<4F5C1CCE.6020706@dcrocker.net> |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1" =3B=20format=3Dflowed|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |X-Originating-IP:=20[172.30.48.1]; bh=XDmH0IKgNwx5qwM1OSvm+TSJkGKmdbFjvyYaTNap9SQ=; b=IN3fA/oTPjqXKM4TSOguIT1kBtLra3q2ZbOIprCHqXBg4QLy5lg8wgGQ 6RkMJrmm1DcoZY2Ei6EdeJfFG5P65y1gAdr04Qt26ULOWEhc8hELtrZwE TH7AYPJWyK61vg0stnij+ROxzChW/6gekM/f/pUcaeKgzj0UoueQeouUx A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6645"; a="169098226"
Received: from ironmsg02-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.16]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2012 19:37:54 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,565,1325491200"; d="scan'208";a="157871672"
Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by ironmsg02-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 10 Mar 2012 19:37:54 -0800
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:37:54 -0800
Message-ID: <4F5C1E10.6000909@qualcomm.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:37:52 -0600
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <62FF481C5AD21C3F683CD2B9@PST.JCK.COM> <4F5B9FF5.7040209@dcrocker.net> <4F5BA20D.30304@qualcomm.com> <B47E8B2B6E9CA7E84099E605@PST.JCK.COM> <4F5C1CCE.6020706@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F5C1CCE.6020706@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash.all@tools.ietf.org, John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-appswg-xdash-03
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 03:38:06 -0000

On 3/10/12 9:32 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:

> Perhaps you can state, in simple terms, exactly what problem passage 
> of this document causes or what benefit exists in retaining the 
> convention of distinguishing X- prefixes, and the like? 

Perhaps you can indentify the particular word in John's message you 
didn't understand.

Oh, you mean....nevermind.

(Sometimes the forms of queries are attacking and are therefore not 
useful to bringing a conversation to a good conclusion.)

(*grumble*)

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email