IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-appswg-xdash-03

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Sun, 11 March 2012 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6051A21F84CF; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:48:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.591
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.591 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.008, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Eoo5RZNNxVr; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:48:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFA621F85F3; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:48:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squire.local (unknown [216.17.175.160]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1666C4005B; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:00:48 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4F5C2084.5020104@stpeter.im>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:48:20 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <62FF481C5AD21C3F683CD2B9@PST.JCK.COM> <4F5B9FF5.7040209@dcrocker.net> <4F5BA20D.30304@qualcomm.com> <B47E8B2B6E9CA7E84099E605@PST.JCK.COM> <4F5C1CCE.6020706@dcrocker.net> <4F5C1E10.6000909@qualcomm.com> <4F5C1E4F.8010507@qualcomm.com> <4F5C2010.7020302@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F5C2010.7020302@dcrocker.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash.all@tools.ietf.org, John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-appswg-xdash-03
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 03:48:38 -0000

On 3/10/12 8:46 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/10/2012 7:38 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> On 3/10/12 9:37 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>>
>> (Something obnoxious)
>>
>> I'm VERY sorry. Accidental reply all.
> 
> 
> First email system I built defaulted to reply all.  Head of the Army
> Materiel Command was one of the earliest users and provided a similar
> demonstration of why it's a really, really bad default.

Hey, would you guys stop sending all these messages on a Saturday night?
I'm trying to write an Internet-Draft... :P

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email