Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-00

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 01 March 2012 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901B321E82DF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:07:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.037
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.438, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IlebXRQ+G97y for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:07:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 79C5821E82BA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:07:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Mar 2012 22:07:51 -0000
Received: from p5DCC2B62.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [93.204.43.98] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 01 Mar 2012 23:07:51 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18CD/tKwoECs8yDU5/jNeqqSY6Cm7PSzajAySYM7a +HQTFZVpPUkZdn
Message-ID: <4F4FF332.2080900@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:07:46 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
References: <4F4FD7EB.8080004@cloudmark.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392806FAA0@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F4FDA86.4040506@cloudmark.com> <4F4FDCF4.2000107@gmx.de> <1330638432.2531.12.camel@neutron> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392806FDBB@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392806FDBB@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:07:54 -0000

On 2012-03-01 23:00, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Here’s an example:
>
>       [I-D.IETF-MARF-AUTHFAILURE-REPORT]
>
>                             Fontana, H.,"Authentication Failure Reporting using the
>
>                             Abuse Report Format",
>
>                             I-Ddraft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report  <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report>, January 2012.

Actually that's bad example.

It doesn't use "Internet-Draft" as seriesInfo, and thus doesn't produce 
the "work in progress" label.

(yes, I'm nitpicking here)

Best regards, Julian