[apps-discuss] ARCING BoF and mailing list

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 28 January 2016 17:22 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:22:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBCQfCeo6FibLoNFzSpNh-k6XH3dayRcYAXM0WeO1WTeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c165226daaa5052a682b38"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/IcAfRhOqnRKbq7vk-Qpdl9Adta0>
Subject: [apps-discuss] ARCING BoF and mailing list
Precedence: list

Howdy,

Andrew Sullivan, Suzanne Woolf and I have put a request in for a BoF at
IETF 95 (arcing <http://tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/>) that is trying to take a
slightly different squint at how to manage alternative resolution contexts
like that of mDNS, .onion, or similar.  We're trying to look beyond recent
issues about RFC 6761 and special use name
 to see if there are different architectural approaches to the general
problem.


There's a stab at a problem statement draft
<https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hardie-resolution-contexts-01.txt>
available, building off of work that's already been done in DNSOP and other
places.  There is also a mailing list set up for early discussion (
arcing@ietf.org), and we'd appreciate anyone interested in the topic
joining the discussion there.

Apologies if you get multiple copies; it must mean we *really* want you to
join.

thanks,

Ted, Andrew, Suzanne

[apps-discuss] ARCING BoF and mailing list Ted Hardie