[apps-discuss] connection limits, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 29 October 2013 16:03 UTC

Message-ID: <526FDC52.3030808@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:03:30 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131026225145.0bee7bb8@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131026225145.0bee7bb8@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] connection limits, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
Precedence: list

On 2013-10-27 19:44, S Moonesamy wrote:
> ...
> In Section 6.4
>
>    "A client SHOULD limit the number of simultaneous open connections
>     that it maintains to a given server."
>
> There is an explanation about why a specific number is not included for
> this recommendation in the paragraphs following the above text.  I read
> Issue #131.  I don't see any discussion of the tradeoffs in Section
> 6.4.  The is a note about servers may reject an excessive number of
> connections from a client if they deem that it is abusive.
> ...

I have trouble parsing this comment. Do you see an issue here?

Best regards, Julian

[apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpb… S Moonesamy
[apps-discuss] IANA URIS, was: APPSDIR review of … Julian Reschke
Re: [apps-discuss] IANA URIS, was: APPSDIR review… S Moonesamy
[apps-discuss] Registration requirements for tran… Julian Reschke
Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-h… S Moonesamy
Re: [apps-discuss] Registration requirements for … S Moonesamy
[apps-discuss] connection limits, was: APPSDIR re… Julian Reschke
[apps-discuss] deprecation of HTTP header field l… Julian Reschke