[apps-discuss] Registration requirements for transfer codings, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 28 October 2013 15:53 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0C011E81F8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l0xCfoIcnq05 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEF811E8192 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mb31L-1VGoTJ38gN-00Kd8D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:53:31 +0100
Message-ID: <526E8878.5030903@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:53:28 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131026225145.0bee7bb8@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131026225145.0bee7bb8@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Iyy4hEjTtKuZwmb9gGAuOcUf/ghlos/Cq/okQxKqyuG2nckqf5+ wF65B4rOZAEB4KOkDHZWPzrNaNNL7+HHRMirswndDsDzc0aiieW2YoH9y5xamTtSlvijUhF M/Kg52PttVikMs4BThhjt3fSQhD/7d6DK0TdftibDScbXJ/yXA8/N3W3ADwYWKVzpdDR1pv i9ZREtT28Tvc0ZrD+2atA==
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] Registration requirements for transfer codings, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:53:48 -0000
On 2013-10-27 19:44, S Moonesamy wrote: > ... > The HTTP Transfer Coding namespace (Section 8.4) is currently "First > Come First Served". The new registration procedure required IETF > Review. What is the reason for the change? > ... My understanding is that we wanted to set a high bar because this really ought to happen with lots of care and review. The related ticket is <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/188>, and it was discussed during IETF 75 (<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/minutes?item=minutes75.html>). Best regards, Julian
- [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpb… S Moonesamy
- [apps-discuss] IANA URIS, was: APPSDIR review of … Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] IANA URIS, was: APPSDIR review… S Moonesamy
- [apps-discuss] Registration requirements for tran… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-h… S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Registration requirements for … S Moonesamy
- [apps-discuss] connection limits, was: APPSDIR re… Julian Reschke
- [apps-discuss] deprecation of HTTP header field l… Julian Reschke