Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-05

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 11 April 2012 06:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE0921F86CB; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcK7qBy9jKV7; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9276521F86A3; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.235.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3B6WfAB024193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1334125975; i=@elandsys.com; bh=wdf0IEsBM7AMQ1FEoeNBdA3+WwyfMu3AdLFDT0zTL9g=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=jo3gxuv0CF/AC5c7R2LzvCtXCuAaQBzABZN+Sfs+LeT5m5L6aXVJyD+Zvkq4aRK2E 0HtpkHSDoi40WSnox2yIuPKUFH9tOGRMxRGRTvmegTOhNrJE0KCwKNLWL+u4lAP9lb ocGA0G7EaxgqtjoYQM0OApE2gIuEgxEDcJ8qoIoo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1334125975; i=@elandsys.com; bh=wdf0IEsBM7AMQ1FEoeNBdA3+WwyfMu3AdLFDT0zTL9g=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=vtWKqFKufx6V8ZYS/J0KSIoEAldfT4QQj9I2rCcBYVJcEC1S0AYpmJGmQOe1O69O+ bALXLSmstuWjrPkdDNjHSPN8vwtluuMWRXSEeK2IgABR/J0cWUqfegEjDRMwHLoHZc owVowtfCFEMco7p3+1/ntjDafoT2QFmxZxINDW6E=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120410224902.07658bb8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:15:15 -0700
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <25039.1334105406@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120410153427.08d5c3b0@elandnews.com> <25039.1334105406@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-05
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:32:59 -0000

Hi Mark,

The document shepherd commented on the nits ( 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04889.html 
).  I consider all the comments as addressed and defer to his judgement.

At 17:50 10-04-2012, Mark D. Baushke wrote:
>Yes, the word "RECOMMENDED" given in both the Abstract and in section
>"2. Data Integrity Algorithms" is a RFC 2119 key word as is specified in
>section "1.1. Requirements Terminology" of document
>draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-05.

It is customary only to use RFC 2119 key words after the definition 
(Section 1.1 in the draft).

>Yes. I was uncertain how to properly address the registry.
>
>The intent is to properly reference the "Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol
>Parameters" document under the "MAC Algorithm Names" section. This is
>the URL:
>
>http://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters/ssh-parameters.xml#ssh-parameters-18
>
>and the related text format of that document:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/assignments/ssh-parameters/ssh-parameters.txt
>
>to the table to be updated properly with the new MACs.

IANA reviews the IANA Considerations section for any action (see the 
message from Amanda Barber).  That section seems clear enough as IANA 
will be updating the correct registry.

I'll suggest text just in case:

    IANA is requested to update the MAC Algorithm Names registry
    for Secure Shell Protocol Parameters with the following entries:

Regards,
S. Moonesamy