Re: [apps-discuss] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Stephan Bosch <[e-mail]>]

Hi Alissa, Barry,

On 6/23/2014 4:29 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> On 6/20/14, 7:57 AM, "Barry Leiba" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>>>> "When the ":uniqueid" argument is used, such normalization
>>>>    concerns are the responsibility of the user."
>>>>
>>>> I don't quite get this. Do we expect users to, e.g., specify that
>>>> uniqueid strings should only be compared after conversion to UTF-8?
>>>> That
>>>> would seem to rely on a level of technical sophistication that almost
>>>> no
>>>> users actually have.
>>> I am not sure what exactly you mean here. The normalization concerns
>>> listed before that sentence all apply to header field content, something
>>> the author of a sieve script cannot control directly. With ":uniqueid"
>>> the script author is directly responsible for the composition of the
>>> unique ID value.  [etc...]
>> The problem here, really, is "the user", I think.
>>
>> What you really want to say, and something I don't think would make
>> Alissa blink, is this:
>>
>> NEW
>> When the ":uniqueid" argument is used, any normalization
>> needs to be done in the Sieve script itself, as the unique ID
>> is created.
>> END
> Yes, this solves my issue.

Overlooked this one for -08, sorry. Addressed in -09.

Regards,

Stephan.