IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Wed, 25 June 2014 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40841B2CAA for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 06:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3TlywOBknMc7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 06:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A7171B2CA6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 06:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id uy5so2009788obc.8 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 06:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OqNsj4iLly5DGgJYOBNnxpauTgQyE4Q/OPyPXgDvAps=; b=OUXOg8t2CYbpOS2mJrHKlW4I3PhmDbiKC/24gUD0brOTI46vx5xyteRiE1YLOuqQM7 tZFbPOI3CDtlLlfoKcuAChH9GkiP7SLEf2Wkg0oNau7lLRHgKkuu5GjdWoDeQGRh/879 GPdQJlG/xmH8TfSpoIY8yMb7SyTJt0Vsws38k=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OqNsj4iLly5DGgJYOBNnxpauTgQyE4Q/OPyPXgDvAps=; b=fzdmL429HsgFfwBbMUjq9Tm2CFPc4YBhO8GFr1LIQDp7pMU84UnVcP71QpA21rHGw6 46jLNc4YfO2oMW5ISLP/BcAiG2126S78vM62DzkLYeEHSUQmtWj520oaR0usocXKcMpn vn8ViDqGdXB9Yfmi4LX0iqjUW86C0y0mqLPG9sHsWRVL9qN6W+AIHPy6r9eDXlQA1RX3 hRF7F+g7XUpNQRw6lkSEHEe72AkdPSzxnLu4Ar/1oYXECNU3LGL8LuB9ZRYmrYdcrY+1 QpMmOtiv5nMUtVsnlCAuws2CfNQ1RMfjwEQPBgdhmSKjIFCRrhtWgVtLEcEatv9kpy3T oeZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnmEGlSwjDLKfeq0imXllo+OZ74JIIdaR2qfhRUPp1QNalzD4ZdkaSm594Yt3P7gvQd1P6y
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.158.68 with SMTP id ws4mr15771obb.86.1403704185895; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 06:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.60.100 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 06:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CFD09102.43228%alissa@cooperw.in>
References: <20140620004041.5801.22430.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53A3E7EB.1030604@rename-it.nl> <CFCDF85C.42C1C%alissa@cooperw.in> <53A9E736.9080709@rename-it.nl> <01P9EFAYDH680049PU@mauve.mrochek.com> <53AA7206.7040905@rename-it.nl> <01P9EV40R78G0049PU@mauve.mrochek.com> <CFD06967.43175%alissa@cooperw.in> <CALaySJLWXMiGRW4EiyKbYJjzofgmGdudOyvq+7k_SEvgAVDpHw@mail.gmail.com> <CFD09102.43228%alissa@cooperw.in>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:49:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzzvjmfL41qWFqDmHgkvNuJc6xrZm2A1gFfRH9ejHimnrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013cc0865f4f1904fca95929"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/ZKh1QIHgBI7QNtUnIqodOjYL4TY
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Stephan Bosch <stephan@rename-it.nl>, "draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate@tools.ietf.org>, "appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "ned+ietf@mrochek.com" <ned+ietf@mrochek.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-appsawg-sieve-duplicate-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:49:48 -0000

On 25 June 2014 14:45, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

> I would still be interested in discussing this bit of my DISCUSS:
>
> o Section 6:
> Sieve scripts that include duplicate tests contain potentially sensitive
> information (e.g., subject or body strings). So it seems like the scripts
> should be confidentiality protected in transit. I checked with Barry and he
> said that there is no RFC that specifies if/when scripts should be
> protected in
> transit, and I understand that this document is probably not the right
> place to
> specify required behavior there, but I'd like to discuss (more with the ADs
> than the authors) if there is some plan for specifying that behavior
> somewhere.
>

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5804#section-5 covers this to some degree, I
think.

Dave.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email