Re: [apps-discuss] Wiki for bar bofs?

Scott W Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Fri, 11 March 2011 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDB53A6ABC for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:24:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IV4j8LymyvKV for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E0C3A6AB2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iyj8 with SMTP id 8so3816365iyj.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:25:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5P264IIcobL7tvTnVw8a54gNAFwhbxNMb7wc7iXHvXM=; b=gv51y5jTq1SFSOry/+V4wbFbCl+qwAs+0eLXef++iHOhf6wMPPtPyhuVLDy6uNBN2C pu42gDnTZzFxLC1pxITPB8Wt9U2nQX9uMLAtL0Os/WDin5/KFAbAt9Eb1aQ/3sB1HZBj k0+e8wj+hSdiKaJPtK/OXVVtxewzvhUthwdy0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=BwgMlxvpxSgreAu32ZbrWJ1yqIszw2gF5vjMrIINzawh79jdBR0UJC0wcwwx/KNobZ imst9JLaDSPN3hxt2c+RiS8BRWK7MUDVAOCQLVrodXteLSxUqeAC8cY8wYMuNcJic2RN 74emsJMpGjBC4TWsJ3La0Vfd/JmY/xW5rYfbs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.189.200 with SMTP id df8mr3053072icb.33.1299885956445; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:25:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.114.81 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:25:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.114.81 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:25:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9EB818FD-5DCE-4E1D-8EAC-A487046BD4F5@mnot.net>
References: <4BC10742-7C69-4207-AE32-081A208B8DC5@mnot.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20110310184422.09896d80@resistor.net> <48FD3A57-6FC4-4A2B-8288-79A233F413B6@mnot.net> <2ECD9B78-E9AB-45C1-AFC6-347A2AC5F930@nokia.com> <4D7A2114.7010506@viagenie.ca> <1299852103.1975.85.camel@dab> <E1E7AFB0-8385-45BD-B7DC-5CF95E687FD8@standardstrack.com> <4183E07F-FE16-4D6B-A033-F310CE8B3C10@mnot.net> <3C630C0E-D2A2-423B-8B54-C5509067FC22@cisco.com> <9EB818FD-5DCE-4E1D-8EAC-A487046BD4F5@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:25:56 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikD=vRcrZnbtswe-m=SP_DN-W8B895+QvpMNf9L@mail.gmail.com>
From: Scott W Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf303ea5eaaeb5b8049e3d4873"
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Wiki for bar bofs?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:24:40 -0000

I hear the best bars are in the area somewhat east of the Hilton

[Sent from my mobile.]
On Mar 11, 2011 6:12 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Exactly. We can always cut out the middleman, of course.
>
>
> On 11/03/2011, at 3:13 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>
>>
>> So back to Mark's questions, is there a WIKI page to help coordinate my
drinking problem, I hate to end up with a situation where the transport guys
are having a fine scotch at the same time the RAI guys were opening some
nice Bordeaux.
>>
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> I don't disagree with any particular point raised in this thread, but
for some of us, scheduling bar bofs is difficult, as there are many people
with overlapping areas of interest. Given that Bar BoFs (side meetings,
whatever -- if you want to change the terminology, the meeting page is a
good start!) are often high value, *some* sort of coordination would be
nice.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/03/2011, at 7:07 AM, Eric Burger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Last I looked, we are the IETF, not the ITU.
>>>>
>>>> You do not need permission to get together to drink.
>>>>
>>>> You do not need parliamentary rules to talk about stuff while you get
together to drink.
>>>>
>>>> IF you want to advertise your Bar BOF, PLEASE put an appropriate page
on the wiki. PEOPLE: IT IS A WIKI, not a moderated, official business only
web page.
>>>>
>>>> IF you do NOT want to advertise your Bar BOF, guess what? Do not
advertise it!
>>>>
>>>> Of course, if you want good conversation, do not forget to invite me
and buy me a beer :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 11, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Javier Ubillos wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 08:18 -0500, Simon Perreault wrote:
>>>>>> On 2011-03-11 01:50, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2011-3-11, at 6:14, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>>>>>> Not official BoFs, Bar BoFs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This confusion nicely demonstrates why we're trying to push people
to call these things side meetings:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm part of a group that is organizing a bar BoF. I would prefer ours
to
>>>>>> not be listed in the wiki, exactly for the reasons cited in the
draft.
>>>>>> As a general rule, if you know about the existence of a bar BoF, it
>>>>>> means you're invited. Advertising it at large on a wiki breaks that
>>>>>> filtering mechanism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>
>>>>> I second the algorithm suggested by Klaas Wierenga.
>>>>>
>>>>> ***
>>>>> a "convener MUST buy 1 beer or alternative consumption for all invited
>>>>> attendees of the bar BoF" would solve lots of the problems you
mention:
>>>>>
>>>>> - reduce the number of attendees
>>>>> - favor meeting in a bar
>>>>> - gives a more informal way of communication
>>>>> ***
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees/current/msg00300.html
>>>>>
>>>>> // Javier
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss