IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] SMTP reply codes and nullMX (was: Re: Last minute concern on nullmx draft)

"Rolf E. Sonneveld" <R.E.Sonneveld@sonnection.nl> Mon, 15 September 2014 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <R.E.Sonneveld@sonnection.nl>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A131A6F99 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KsPW67RnSUkF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx20.mailtransaction.com (mx20.mailtransaction.com [78.46.16.213]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53481A6FC5 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx24.mailtransaction.com (mx21.mailtransaction.com [78.46.16.236]) by mx20.mailtransaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3hxdbd50Yfz1L8f3; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:55:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jaguar.sonnection.nl (D57E1702.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.126.23.2]) by mx24.mailtransaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3hxdbd2Yswz1L8f2; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:55:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jaguar.sonnection.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFFE12338C; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:55:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sonnection.nl
Received: from jaguar.sonnection.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jaguar.sonnection.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Vgz7sCHM_y82; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:55:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.49] (unknown [192.168.1.49]) by jaguar.sonnection.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46172123377; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:55:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <54174433.50707@sonnection.nl>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:55:31 +0200
From: "Rolf E. Sonneveld" <R.E.Sonneveld@sonnection.nl>
Organization: Sonnection B.V.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20140914212927.2058.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20140914212927.2058.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sonnection.nl; s=2009; t=1410810941; bh=W2XO0mEsmy55ZWYUpAoUObO+zOiYhfF/8kcKvi8A+RM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=mFxVvdH2JHJ3854UgiDbpjVGxgnbjlkn+nQVBZ3weNoWxc5xGUrQ3JRPRJh37Fphw KEEuwqKSXYQ3inRiLOXiRuIkn98nb1H3lvBXuaYmq+JHoy9YFOC5X/Pxcdpdyt4bTS IRv3RE7OZVFwiiY9/OlY9j+B9jrmrichTimlDn4o=
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.2 mx20.mailtransaction.com 3hxdbd50Yfz1L8f3
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/SCbudmxYwrMszm1-qXOHSQ4g5nI
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] SMTP reply codes and nullMX (was: Re: Last minute concern on nullmx draft)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: R.E.Sonneveld@sonnection.nl
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:55:45 -0000

On 09/14/2014 11:29 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> I.e. the only zero-length label is the label that terminates a series of
>> labels (i.e. the root label).
> Yes, that's the one that nullmx uses.
>
> I don't understand what you think is wrong here.

nothing wrong, the zero-length label and the single dot were a bit 
confusing, but after re-reading the draft and RFC1035 it's now clear to 
me that draft and RFC1035 are coherent ;-).

/rolf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email