IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] SMTP reply codes and nullMX (was: Re: Last minute concern on nullmx draft)

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 14 September 2014 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAA41A02D7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fnf-2XKyz-7m for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E75A1A02C1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10516 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2014 21:29:50 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 14 Sep 2014 21:29:50 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=80b.541608ce.k1409; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=bBDOSSRLnNfvVfJjFAjTOq11K6TeKPIvqRTM6VrpXAM=; b=amfn0kBFlZOJWfZoBj4pKlq3Nx6tBoEo3YIas1JNShObCGJkY8qrgKahczNO5sL0DOAgZm7zoY9NVHzZ/eGz/KUk6Tc7iHUtsXEX3znEuQWLtpGGcm+dGxUA3HzhzPOEtmOao0txBWMpT7UkGfJ+ZHFKLA/LzBAwoRGEyG5/ntYdrlKun/JVvLWf5GgKlccudQuZIk7I0B9hbUp2Dqa2UBOQNS+l60z6rPRANv+sVm6PStPJ19FqBe91nryXDYBu
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=80b.541608ce.k1409; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=bBDOSSRLnNfvVfJjFAjTOq11K6TeKPIvqRTM6VrpXAM=; b=SXIIlvyYFIzyB7KlvcFL4hSJ/AwtRrrlzUnydjjdxaskf9Ldh+eAHHOm4lSkY8F3UW8+WPJpYMzkiLJ89Rel0e4hFDQTsbso6F1QJrlTHw7Nd7Xx8NkwE0ORmg0KIltpohBpUpN2Js/f810z93DDZ6LshscBm4hv/q0HhD89sQdwC0aoz/N8wM0NvYBeBYKxfbHH/Z+mN6PkRO64/c9aXzx9qv9RnIAmKKzUbxIriWRhh5BKhoIH9a+6hZAcFLIX
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:29:27 -0000
Message-ID: <20140914212927.2058.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5414ACFA.7020705@sonnection.nl>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/rZskoW72ydVTkrGHhHah9RehQ64
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] SMTP reply codes and nullMX (was: Re: Last minute concern on nullmx draft)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:29:53 -0000

>I.e. the only zero-length label is the label that terminates a series of 
>labels (i.e. the root label).

Yes, that's the one that nullmx uses.

I don't understand what you think is wrong here.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email