Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME regarding "charset" Parameter Handling in Textual Media Types
Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> Tue, 10 July 2012 08:41 UTC
Return-Path: <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555AF21F85E4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oL+RfyCiZYJo for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay1.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay1.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6398121F85E6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.205]) by relay1.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>) id 1SoW1C-0007Rp-3a for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:42:02 +0100
Received: from gklyne.plus.com ([80.229.154.156] helo=Eskarina.local) by smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>) id 1SoW1B-0001Kp-7u for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:42:02 +0100
Message-ID: <4FFBE454.1020601@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:14:12 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Organization: Zoology, Oxford University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20120710000754.6BF59B1E006@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120710000754.6BF59B1E006@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:11:32 -0700
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME regarding "charset" Parameter Handling in Textual Media Types
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:41:37 -0000
On 10/07/2012 01:07, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 6657 > > Title: Update to MIME regarding "charset" > Parameter Handling in Textual Media Types I didn't see this one coming. I'm a bit confused by the specification. If we define a media type that is *always* UTF-8, does this count as transporting its own charset information? Should we say that the media type SHOULD NOT be included, or that it SHOULD be included with value UTF-8? Section 3 implies the latter, but it also talks about media types defining their own default encoding. (This is not an academic question - a W3C group I'm involved with is about to submit a registration for a UTF-8 only text/... media type) #g -- > Author: A. Melnikov, J. Reschke > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: July 2012 > Mailbox: Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com, > julian.reschke@greenbytes.de > Pages: 6 > Characters: 10111 > Updates: RFC2046 > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset-04.txt > > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6657.txt > > This document changes RFC 2046 rules regarding default "charset" > parameter values for "text/*" media types to better align with common > usage by existing clients and servers. [STANDARDS-TRACK] > > This document is a product of the Applications Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. > > This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. > > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track > protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet > Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and > status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. > For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC > > > _______________________________________________ > apps-discuss mailing list > apps-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss >
- [apps-discuss] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME regardi… rfc-editor
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME reg… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME reg… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME reg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME reg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME reg… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME reg… Graham Klyne