[apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7578 (4676)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 26 April 2016 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4FB12B02A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mIQrtpxf6dEh for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98BC612D549 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9A73D180005; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: masinter@adobe.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, superuser@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160426172518.9A73D180005@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/Y3z_LBWoi6Gh-glFoblcarndzSQ>
Cc: egon.eckert@heaven-industries.com, apps-discuss@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7578 (4676)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:25:30 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7578,
"Returning Values from Forms: multipart/form-data".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Egon Eckert <egon.eckert@heaven-industries.com>

Section: 4.6.

Original Text
       content-disposition: form-data; name="_charset_"

       content-disposition: form-data; name="field1"

       ...text encoded in iso-8859-1 ...

Corrected Text
       content-disposition: form-data; name="_charset_"

       content-disposition: form-data; name="field1"

       ...text encoded in iso-8859-1 ...

Boundary hyphens were misplaced, I think.  The second boundary delimiter should not have them on the end of the line, and the last boundary delimiter should have them on the beginning of the line too.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC7578 (draft-ietf-appsawg-multipart-form-data-11)
Title               : Returning Values from Forms: multipart/form-data
Publication Date    : July 2015
Author(s)           : L. Masinter
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : ART Area General Application Working Group
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG