Re: [apps-discuss] Applications Directorate Review of draft-desruisseaux-caldav-sched-11

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 08 March 2012 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F6D21F86BB; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:16:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jzHIP2SUv5Fg; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:16:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F36A21F86B9; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:16:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; l=1168; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1331230565; x=1332440165; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MhOnzPN/cfVK5RgK1IiX88/pjp7KfjUcG1Tuwk74qTg=; b=DrwFMpUNpBlLu9NfUDVq80x/ET1JM9i/axvZtqNjrSrbM8OBSECkJmIM mYuPnHGXyXx9ltIclqIDZ26Iw+3GL7KXi6eSbM0wXk8ANjJzmsF7ZQksF aKTIoIMbS7pBgqJfqWobRQPZzdRztk+gPLqdbLEET2Ga4j7wTmzhma3SF Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAM72WE+Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABDhTWvb4EHggoBAQEDARIBEFUBEAsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGDQEFAgEBHodjBZs9AYxnkjOBL44pgRYElUWQGIJk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,553,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="131751150"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2012 18:15:59 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-55-89-64.cisco.com (dhcp-10-55-89-64.cisco.com [10.55.89.64]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q28IFwkv018154; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:15:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4F58F75E.4060101@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:15:58 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
References: <4F588C9D.2090403@cisco.com> <4F58A77A.6090706@gmx.de> <4F58B1AF.20008@cisco.com> <4F58B347.1030101@greenbytes.de> <4F58B9AA.5020902@cisco.com> <F2849AEAF07B34368235EE3F@cyrus.local>
In-Reply-To: <F2849AEAF07B34368235EE3F@cyrus.local>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, draft-desruisseaux-caldav-sched.all@tools.ietf.org, Peter Saint-Andre <Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, 'IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Applications Directorate Review of draft-desruisseaux-caldav-sched-11
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 18:16:06 -0000

Hi Cyrus,

On 3/8/12 4:51 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
>
> --On March 8, 2012 2:52:42 PM +0100 Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Please read my review where I suggest text that references tables.
>
> Just on this one point:
>
> 1) There is only ever one table per section in the draft, so a
> reference to a table can be reasonably provided as "the table in
> Section XXX".
>
> 2) Most the the tables are defined using xml2rfc <texttable> elements.
> However, some tables are too complex for xml2rfc's table layout, and
> hence are implemented as ascii-art in a <figure>. That poses a problem
> when using xml2rfc's built-in references because <texttable>
> references appear as "Table 1", whereas <figure> references appear as
> "Figure 1". That would mean we had a mixture of different reference
> labels. Now, it is possible to change all the current <texttable>
> elements to be ascii art instead, but given point #1 above, I would
> rather not have to do that.

>
> So bottom line, my preference is to use a reference of the form
> described in #1 above whenever needed.
>

Ok.  I feel your pain on this point.

Eliot